![]() Very visionary, but it has its flaws: artists don't have an identity there, a "profile" (feels sterile and sad), and can't be personally contacted after purchase, so the customer experience can be problematic sometimes customers service went worse in quality and slower in time, after the Shutterstock acquisition Royalty given to artists is LOW Submitting models can be tricky for artists who are not much skilled and the interface is not the best Some UI/UX is also bad in several other areas (like the list of downloaded models) and often hampers the chances to valorize some features and to introduce others (like adding a list of bookmarked products). For artists, much bigger sales and visibility than other sites, in general. Not just that: this is the only website that offers to artists an automated service to convert formats (with their materials, with fidelity), and a side service called Pixelsquid for selling renders-only of submitted 3D products. Further, this is the only website where inspectors check and test the quality of some eligible products, applying a badge that shows that to customers. I am a 3D creator, I chosen Turbosquid because it's the only website that promotes your content in the first results if your skills are high and in my experience the "meritocracy" was always coherent, but at the cost of exclusivity (which I accepted).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |